Escoliosis idiopáticas graves. ¿El abordaje y la instrumentación modifican los resultados? / Severe idiopathic scoliosis. Does the approach and the instruments used modify the results?

Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar y comparar los resultados radiográficos y las complicaciones del tratamiento quirúrgico de escoliosis idiopáticas del adolescente mayores de 75◦ mediante doble abordaje (DA) o vía posterior aislada con instrumentación híbrida (PH) o «todo-tornillos» (PT). Material y método: Se realiza una revisión retrospectiva de 69 pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente mayor de 75◦ y seguimiento superior a los 2 años para analizar la flexibilidad de las curvas, la corrección obtenida y las complicaciones en función del tipo de cirugía. El análisis estadístico se realizó mediante el test de Kruskal-Wallis para variables no paramétricas. Resultados: No existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los 3 grupos en los valores del ángulo de Cobb preoperatorio (DA = 89◦, PH = 83◦, PT = 83◦), en el postoperatorio inmediato (DA = 34◦, PH = 33◦, PT = 30◦) ni al final del seguimiento (DA = 36◦, PH = 36◦, PT = 33◦) (p > 0,05). El porcentaje de corrección (DA = 60%, PH = 57%, PT = 60%) fue similar entre grupos (p > 0,05). El porcentaje de complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento fue del 20,8% en DA, del 10% en PH y del 20% en PT. Dos pacientes en el grupo PT experimentaron cambios en la monitorización medular sin lesión neurológica y un paciente del mismo grupo experimentó una lesión incompleta diferida y temporal. Discusión y conclusiones: No se aprecian diferencias significativas en la corrección de las escoliosis idiopáticas graves entre los pacientes intervenidos mediante doble abordaje o por vía posterior aislada, independientemente del tipo de instrumentación utilizada (AU)

Objective: The aim of this work is to evaluate and compare the radiographic results and complications of the surgical treatment of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis greater than 75 degrees, using a double approach (DA) or an isolated posterior approach with hybrid instruments (posterior hybrid [PH]), or with «all-pedicle screws» (posterior screws [PS]). Material and method: A retrospective review was performed on 69 patients with idiopathic scoliosis greater than 75◦, with a follow-up of more than 2 years, to analyze the flexibility of the curves, the correction obtained, and the complications depending on the type of surgery. The Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric variables was used for the statistical analysis. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 patient groups in the pre-surgical Cobb angle values (DA = 89◦, PH = 83◦, PS = 83◦), in the immediate post-surgical (DA = 34◦, PH = 33◦, PS = 30◦), nor at the end of follow-up (DA = 36◦, PH = 36◦, PS = 33◦) (P > .05). The percentage correction (DA = 60%, PH = 57%, PS = 60%) was similar between groups (P > .05). The percentage of complications associated with the procedure was 20.8% in DA, 10% in PH and 20% in PS. Two patients in the PS group showed changes, with no neurological lesions, in the spinal cord monitoring, and one patient in the same group suffered a delayed and transient incomplete lesion. Discussion and conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the correction of severe idiopathic scoliosis between patients operated using the double or isolated posterior approach, regardless of the type of instrumentation used (AU)

[Severe idiopathic scoliosis. Does the approach and the instruments used modify the results?]. / Escoliosis idiopáticas graves. ¿El abordaje y la instrumentación modifican los resultados?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to evaluate and compare the radiographic results and complications of the surgical treatment of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis greater than 75 degrees, using a double approach (DA) or an isolated posterior approach with hybrid instruments (posterior hybrid [PH]), or with «all-pedicle screws¼ (posterior screws [PS]). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective review was performed on 69 patients with idiopathic scoliosis greater than 75°, with a follow-up of more than 2 years, to analyze the flexibility of the curves, the correction obtained, and the complications depending on the type of surgery. The Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric variables was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 patient groups in the pre-surgical Cobb angle values (DA=89°, PH=83°, PS=83°), in the immediate post-surgical (DA=34°, PH=33°, PS=30°), nor at the end of follow-up (DA=36°, PH=36°, PS=33°) (P>.05). The percentage correction (DA=60%, PH=57%, PS=60%) was similar between groups (P>.05). The percentage of complications associated with the procedure was 20.8% in DA, 10% in PH and 20% in PS. Two patients in the PS group showed changes, with no neurological lesions, in the spinal cord monitoring, and one patient in the same group suffered a delayed and transient incomplete lesion. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in the correction of severe idiopathic scoliosis between patients operated using the double or isolated posterior approach, regardless of the type of instrumentation used.